Skip to main content

Culture-Specific Diseases: They Can Only Hurt You If You Believe In Them

After reading a title like that, I'm sure you have a ton of questions (as you should). How can a mental illness pick and choose which people it infects, and why is this mechanism tied to a person's culture and home region? It almost sounds more ridiculous than warding off a Sea Bear with a circle:



First, if you haven't already read my previous article, "The Non-Existence of 'Normal,'" then I would suggest taking a quick look at that first (it may help things make a bit more sense). Second order of business: we need to distinguish the types of diseases we are talking about. This article will be focusing on the cultural impact upon mental disorders, not upon biological viruses or other medical conditions. So please do not misunderstand and think that if you don't believe in a virus (@ COVID) it will not kill you - it definitely still can.

SAME NAME, DIFFERENT GAME

We know that our fluid and undefinable concepts of what is "normal" affect the way that we diagnose and experience mental illnesses. As it turns out, an individual's cultural background (where you are from, what you believe in, how you view life) has a similar impact upon how they interpret the world around them . So since psychological disorders are dependent on the individual experiencing them, people of different cultural beliefs will experience different forms of mental illnesses. This phenomenon includes people of different countries showing completely different symptoms under the same diagnosis. 

For instance, PTSD in America is typically characterized by a lot of emotion-related symptoms (flashbacks, negative thoughts and reactions, avoidance). And yet in 2004, the people of Sri Lanka who survived a devastating tsunami did not experience PTSD in these symptoms, but rather in the harm done to their relationships and their role in the community. The reason for these different symptoms is because in Sri Lankan culture, their unity is a crucial part of their life, and so it was a clear indicator of who was in need of help and who was adjusting after witnessing such a traumatic event.

If you have the time to spare, I would highly recommend watching the video linked below because it goes into a lot more depth about how culture impacts mental illness and gives a lot of detailed examples (including the Sri Lanka discovery): GRCC Diversity Lecture - Ethan Watters

CULTURAL SYNDROMES


In addition to mental illnesses being associated with different sets of symptoms, we also see examples of "cultural syndromes," which are conditions that seem to only exist within certain cultures. Here is a quick list of examples of such syndromes:
  • Koro (or Suo Yang): Feeling like their genitals are being sucked into their body by some supernatural force (curse, spirit, spell). Experienced in Nigeria, Benin, China, Singapore, and Hong Kong.
  • Frigophobia: A fear of cold, which is rooted in traditional Chinese cosmology of balancing hot and cold. Experienced in China.
  • Amok (as in "running amok"): When people go on a killing spree that they fail to remember later. Experienced in Malaysia.
  • Hikikomori: When a person socially withdraws to the point of never leaving home. Experienced in Japan.
  • Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (or PMS): When women experience mood swings, food cravings, irritability, and/or depression while on their period. Experienced in America.***
*** Yes, America, of course you've got some strange syndromes, too!

So, turns out that there are actually some diseases you can literally only get if you believe in them. This phenomenon of unique mental syndromes and different symptoms associated with similar diagnosis labels further shows how our perception on life and what is "normal" in our culture will affect our mental health.

REFERENCES
 he Diseases You Only Get if You Believe in Them (not going to lie, this article was SUPER interesting)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Healthy Approaches to Relieve Stress: Distraction, Relaxation, & Self Expression

There are thousands of articles on the internet about ways to relieve stress, and most of them boast about the same three or four boring strategies. But the truth is that there are many ways to help alleviate your stress and anxiety, and many of these coping mechanisms fall under one of the following three strategies: distraction, self-expression, and relaxation. Each category is special because each one has a unique underlying goal for you to achieve, and all of them have the potential to help you maintain a good mental state. In the following article, I'll provide both the pros and cons of each strategy and a short list of related example activities. My hope is that you find at least one approach that is a Cinderella-shoe type fit for you! DISTRACTION METHODS While it may initially sound like an unhealthy self-care goal, activities related to distraction are effective because they buy an individual time to take a step back, cool down and regroup. By taking a temporary break from ...

How to Avoid Being Tricked By Psychology Jargon

If you have ever tried to read an academic paper or a research study, then you know how tough it can be to decipher what exactly it is trying to say. While some of the field jargon is a necessary part of a professional write up, I do feel that some of the confusing terms lead to the gatekeeping of interesting and valuable information from the general public. And to make matters worse, this complex language has contributed to the spread of misinformation by the media because non-experts are reporting about research studies without understanding what the findings truly mean. To help you navigate and better understand scientific research, I will be teaching you about the differences between some of the most confusing and misleading words used in most research papers. These words are tricky because they are often treated like synonyms to each other when in reality, they mean completely different things. By understanding the concepts below, you will 1) sound super smart (and who doesn't...

Where the "Vaccines Cause Autism" Rumor Came From, & Why It's Completely Wrong

One way or another, you have likely heard of the term "anti-vaxxers," or people who disagree with the use of vaccines. The arguments defending anti-vax lifestyles may vary, but one particularly ugly misconception is that vaccines cause autism in children. Despite the rumor being completely, unquestionably proven wrong, the harmful effects of spreading this lie are beginning to show. Outbreaks of viruses "eradicated" long ago are beginning to plague our society once again, and even newer diseases such as COVID-19 are posing a threat to a public reluctant to be vaccinated. But before we go into the current situation, let's start at where the vaccine-rumor was first started. ANDREW WAKEFIELD There are a lot of words to describe Andrew Wakefield and his work, and none of them are nice. Andrew Wakefield was a former British doctor who suggested there was a connection between the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and autism in children. His "findings...